DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR06868-13
26 November 2013
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 22 November 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory
opinion (A/0) furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) memo
1070 MMSB-13 of 20 Nov 2013, a copy of which is being provided
to you.
The Board also notes that you have applied for a correction to
your record for an error that allegedly occurred more than 40
years ago. Under the rules governing this Board, an application
for a correction of a naval record must be made within three
years aiter the discovery of the alleged error. Failure to file
within the prescribed three years may be excused only in cases
where the Board finds that it is in the interests of justice to
do so.
Although you neglected to assert your claim for an inordinately
long period of time without justification and you provided no
evidence as to why you did not seek to have the alleged error
corrected earlier, the Board still decided to review your case.
BR review of your naval record reveals that you were never on
active duty during the year of 1962. However, you were only in
an inactive status from 26 March 1961 until 18 September 1965,
when you were discharged.
Docket No.NRO6868-13
Based on the circumstances described above, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive Di
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4874 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6790 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when he burden is applying for a correction of an official naval record, t on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4871 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7850 13
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NROQ7850-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5307 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO5307-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6440 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted jn support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5899 13
In June 2013, your husband sought 2 correction to his naval record to show that he enrolled his spouse, Ey -: the sole beneficiary of SBP within one year of his marriage. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2475 13
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, In addition, the Board considered the regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2367 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when Docket No.NRO2367-15 applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6581 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. PERS-40DD, your SDIP request was approved 20 November 2013 but the message was not released until Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.